I believe Model Engineer & Workshop Mag is soon to publish a series of articles where test prints were subject to various tests, I understand the results are more than promising.
As for pull out of studs, I did a basic test with a M4 x 0.5 metric fine thread 3mm long into the ALSiMG and was quite happy with how well it held up. the way the part is orientated is how it was printed so the load would be trying to pull the layers apart.
https://youtu.be/zSeL2acqw5A?si=9cSCZXW8NvvWEEyq
I have also been quite happy with machined surfaces, as I almost exclusively use carbide these days it did not bat an eyelid and no signs of excessive tool wear that was with uncoated cutters. not needed to file them much, just knock off slight burrs around the edge of machined surfaces but did not seem to affect my needle files and have not noticed any problems with HSS drills or taps..
My grains seemed to come off in curls much like aluminium castings, not as stringy as 2014 or 6082 but definately not granular like cast iron. Surface is smooth but not as reflective as a similar cut on solid block, certainly can't see grains with the naked eye. Nearest I would say to it is if you have ever machined the angle brackets that come with the DROs then the 3D prints machine much like those aluminium brackets.
Crankcases that I have seen 3D printed have tended to be for model aircraft. Some are for top class pylon racing which will certainly see far more extrems of heat and compression ratios than a seal sat on a display stand. The one pictured is good for 34,000rpm without blowing the cylinder/head off the crankcase.